PD Smith

About me

I’m the author of four books. City was pub­lished in spring 2012 and is a guide­book to our urban age, tak­ing the read­er on a jour­ney through the past, present and future of the world’s cities.

City front cover

My pre­vi­ous book, Dooms­day Men, was a cul­tur­al his­to­ry of sci­ence, super­weapons and oth­er strangeloves, pub­lished by Pen­guin in the UK, St Mar­t­in’s Press in the US and by Com­pan­hia das Letras in Brazil. I’ve also writ­ten a brief biog­ra­phy of Ein­stein and a some­what longer study of sci­ence in Ger­man lit­er­a­ture called Metaphor and Mate­ri­al­i­ty. I’m cur­rent­ly writ­ing my next book which is called Watch­ing the Detec­tives. I write fic­tion too, although as yet none of this has been pub­lished.

So why is my web­site called ‘Kafka’s mouse’?

There’s a won­der­ful sto­ry by Kaf­ka called “Josephine the Singer, or the Mouse Folk” that’s haunt­ed me ever since I first read it as a stu­dent. I’ve writ­ten a short piece about what it means to me for the Inde­pen­dent and a longer arti­cle for the web­site 3 Quarks Dai­ly.

When Josephine sings, her fel­low mice are trans­fixed by the sounds she makes with­out know­ing why. Although those lis­ten­ing feel her voice is unex­cep­tion­al, there is an unde­ni­able qual­i­ty to her per­for­mances that com­mands atten­tion and moves them deeply. They lis­ten in com­plete silence. Some­times it is dif­fi­cult to tell whether it is the singing or the still­ness that sur­rounds her voice that is so com­pelling.

“Some­thing of our poor brief child­hood is in it, some­thing of lost hap­pi­ness that can nev­er be found again, but also some­thing of active dai­ly life, of its small gai­eties, unac­count­able and yet spring­ing up and not to be oblit­er­at­ed.”

And then one day Josephine is gone. She had warned them that she might leave, but no one believed her. The nar­ra­tor claims that it makes lit­tle dif­fer­ence to him and his fel­low mice: she will soon be for­got­ten. But his words ring hol­low. His mov­ing descrip­tion of her singing, writ­ten after Josephine’s dis­ap­pear­ance, shows just how much she means to them. Now that the singer has left, there is a gap­ing hole in their lives.

 

I have nev­er been able to pin down quite what it is about this sto­ry that is so mem­o­rable. At times, Josephine has seemed to me to be an artist or a poet, giv­ing voice to what peo­ple around her feel but are unable to put into words.

But at oth­er times – par­tic­u­lar­ly when I was research­ing my biog­ra­phy of Ein­stein – she is like a great sci­en­tist, some­one who can read the invis­i­ble lan­guage of the uni­verse, glimps­ing the mind of god while the rest of us strug­gle to fol­low her most basic thoughts. After all, as Richard Dawkins has said, sci­ence can allow us to “hear the galax­ies sing”.

Like Josephine’s singing, the story’s mean­ing remains elu­sive, just out of reach. But whether you see Kafka’s Josephine as rep­re­sent­ing writ­ers or sci­en­tists, I can’t help feel­ing that her singing is what life is ulti­mate­ly all about: the quest to under­stand our­selves and our place in the uni­verse.

(If you want to read more about Kaf­ka, I strong­ly rec­om­mend Rein­er Stach’s bril­liant biog­ra­phy. I’ve reviewed the first two vol­umes here and here.)

Sci­ence & lit­er­a­ture

Sci­en­tists, writ­ers, artists – they each use spe­cialised tech­niques and vocab­u­lar­ies, and they see the world through their own unique lens­es. But in the end what unites them is more impor­tant than what divides them: this quest for under­stand­ing. Peo­ple talk about ‘two cul­tures’, with sci­ence on one side of the divide and lit­er­a­ture on the oth­er.

But in my writ­ing I have tried to show how these so-called two cul­tures are clos­er than most peo­ple think.

In Dooms­day Men I tell the true sto­ry of the Dooms­day Bomb, an ulti­mate weapon that ter­ri­fied peo­ple in the cold war. My book reveals how the his­to­ry of weapons of mass destruc­tion is not just one of sol­diers and sci­en­tists, but also about jour­nal­ists and pulp fic­tion writ­ers using their tal­ents to inspire peo­ple with tales about sav­iour sci­en­tists and the dream of the super­weapon. Lat­er, in the atom­ic age, that dream became a night­mare and peo­ple began view­ing sci­en­tists not as sav­iours, but as Dr Strangeloves.

So as well as being a work of nar­ra­tive his­to­ry, my book shows how ideas flow back and forth between pop­u­lar cul­ture and sci­ence. My arti­cle “Faust, the Physi­cists and the Atom­ic Bomb”, pub­lished in 2008, explores themes dis­cussed in my book Dooms­day Men, in par­tic­u­lar the cross-fer­til­iza­tion between sci­ence and lit­er­a­ture in the 1930s, at key moments in atom­ic physics and in the devel­op­ment of the atom­ic bomb. You can down­load a PDF of this here.

I’m fas­ci­nat­ed by the way the ideas of sci­ence per­me­ate our lives and under­pin our beliefs. My ear­li­er study, Metaphor and Mate­ri­al­i­ty, showed how in Ger­man lit­er­a­ture, writ­ers from Goethe through to Robert Musil and Bertolt Brecht explored sci­en­tif­ic ideas in their work. Both books demon­strate that, far from being two divid­ed cul­tures, sci­ence and lit­er­a­ture are part of the same equa­tion.

I write reg­u­lar reviews. You can find my work in the Guardian Review where I do a bi-week­ly round-up of the lat­est non-fic­tion paper­backs, as well as in the Inde­pen­dent, Icon mag­a­zine and the Times Lit­er­ary Sup­ple­ment.

I’m rep­re­sent­ed by Peter Tal­lack at the Curi­ous Minds lit­er­ary agency.

Background

 

I start­ed work­ing with images rather than lan­guage – as a pho­tog­ra­ph­er. After a cou­ple of years at art school, I became an edi­to­r­i­al pho­tog­ra­ph­er, sup­ply­ing land­scape pic­tures to news­pa­pers and mag­a­zines such as The Dai­ly Tele­graph and Homes and Gar­dens.

For me the high­point of this all too brief career as a pho­tog­ra­ph­er was being able to work with my father on the book Writ­ers in Sus­sex. We spent months tramp­ing up and down the high­ways and byways of Sus­sex, one of England’s most beau­ti­ful coun­ties, pho­tograph­ing the hous­es once lived in by writ­ers like HG Wells, Vir­ginia Woolf and Ezra Pound.

Play­wright (and Sus­sex author) Christo­pher Fry was kind enough to write a per­son­al fore­word to our book. I’m grad­u­al­ly putting these pho­tographs, as well as oth­er more recent images, on Flickr. In 1988 I returned to edu­ca­tion as a mature stu­dent, after tak­ing two A‑levels in under a year (that’s a lot of cram­ming when you’re work­ing full-time!). I stud­ied for a degree in Ger­man at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Kent at Can­ter­bury which includ­ed a won­der­ful year at Munich Uni­ver­si­ty. After this I com­plet­ed a doc­tor­ate on sci­ence and lit­er­a­ture in the Ger­man depart­ment at Uni­ver­si­ty Col­lege Lon­don.

Fol­low­ing a brief but fas­ci­nat­ing inter­lude work­ing for Liz Calder as her assis­tant at Blooms­bury Pub­lish­ing, I was award­ed a British Acad­e­my Post­doc­tor­al Fel­low­ship. This pres­ti­gious award allowed me to con­tin­ue my aca­d­e­m­ic research on sci­ence in cul­ture for a fur­ther three years, while teach­ing in the Ger­man depart­ment at UCL.

Dur­ing 2003 and 2004 I taught a course on sci­ence and lit­er­a­ture in the Depart­ment of Sci­ence and Tech­nol­o­gy Stud­ies at UCL. The STS depart­ment at UCL sub­se­quent­ly made me an Hon­orary Research Asso­ciate.

Articles & reviews by me on science & literature

Brief review of Sci­ence on Stage: From “Doc­tor Faus­tus” to “Copen­hagen”, by Kirsten Shep­herd-Barr, Guardian, 20 Octo­ber 2012

Brief review of Ther­moPo­et­ics by Bar­ri J Gold, Guardian, 24 March 2012

Clare Dud­man inter­viewed me in 2009 for her lit­er­ary blog, Keep­er of the Snails.

“The extra­or­di­nary abil­i­ty of sci­ence to trans­form peo­ple’s view of the world”, Why is sci­ence impor­tant?, Feb­ru­ary 2009

“Faust, the Physi­cists and the Atom­ic Bomb”, Pub­li­ca­tions of the Eng­lish Goethe Soci­ety, vol 77, no 2 (2008), 101–12

“Elec­tive Affin­i­ty: A Tale of Two Cul­tures?”, Prometheus, 04 (2000), 46–65

Sci­ence and the City: Alfred Döblin’s Berlin Alexan­der­platz”, Lon­don Mag­a­zine, April/May 2000, 27–36

“Sci­en­tif­ic Themes in Goethe’s Faust” In: Paul Bish­op (ed), A Com­pan­ion to Goethe’s Faust (Colum­bia: Cam­den House, 2001)

“The Sci­en­tist as Spec­ta­tor: Musil’s Tör­leß & the Chal­lenge to Mach’s Neo-Pos­i­tivism”, The Ger­man­ic Review 75 (2000): 37–51

“Ger­man Lit­er­a­ture and the Sci­en­tif­ic World-View in the Nine­teenth and Twen­ti­eth Cen­turies”, Jour­nal of Euro­pean Stud­ies 27 (1997): 389–415

“Who cares when the rock­ets come down?”, review of Mad, Bad and Dan­ger­ous? The Sci­en­tist and the Cin­e­ma, by Christo­pher Frayling, Guardian, 25 Feb­ru­ary 2006

“In the ditch”, review of Lit­er­a­ture and Sci­ence, 1660–1834, ed by Judith Haw­ley, Times Lit­er­ary Sup­ple­ment, 6 August 2004

Cul­tur­al his­to­ry”, review of Sci­ence, read­ing, and renais­sance lit­er­a­ture: The art of mak­ing knowl­edge, by Eliz­a­beth Spiller, Times Lit­er­ary Sup­ple­ment, 3 Sep­tem­ber 2004

“Best wear a good thick skirt”, review arti­cle on Land­scape, Nature, & the Body Politic, by K Olwig; The Pol­i­tics of Nature, by N Roe; Roman­ti­cism & the Mate­ri­al­i­ty of Nature, by O Oer­le­mans; In Nature’s Name, ed by B Gates, Guardian, 22 June 2002

The One Cul­ture? A con­ver­sa­tion about sci­ence, ed by Jay A. Labinger and Har­ry Collins, review in the Times Lit­er­ary Sup­ple­ment, 26 July 2002

“The wing­beat of the unknown”, review of Gram­mars of Cre­ation, by George Stein­er, Times Lit­er­ary Sup­ple­ment, 6 April 2001