PD Smith

Doomsday Men: The Real Dr Strangelove and the Dream of the Superweapon

Homo sapi­ens is the only species that knows it will die. The thought obsess­es us. From the ear­li­est marks made on cave walls to our most sub­lime works of art, the fear of death haunts our every cre­ation. And in the mid­dle of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, human beings became the first species to reach that pin­na­cle of evo­lu­tion – the point at which it could engi­neer its own extinc­tion.

In Feb­ru­ary 1950, as the tem­per­a­ture of the cold war approached absolute zero, an atom­ic sci­en­tist con­ceived the ulti­mate nuclear weapon: a vast explo­sive device that would cast a dead­ly pall of fall­out over the plan­et. Car­ried on the wind, the lethal radioac­tive dust would even­tu­al­ly reach all four cor­ners of the world. It would mean the end of life on earth.

One of the found­ing fathers of the atom­ic age, Leo Szi­lard, stat­ed that it would be very easy to rig an H‑bomb to pro­duce lethal radioac­tiv­i­ty. All you had to do, said Szi­lard, was sur­round the bomb with a chem­i­cal ele­ment such as cobalt that absorbs radi­a­tion. When it explod­ed, the bomb would spew radioac­tive dust into the air like an arti­fi­cial vol­cano. Slow­ly and silent­ly, this invis­i­ble killer would fall to the sur­face. ‘Everyone would be killed,’ he said.

In the 1950s – the dooms­day decade – the fall­out from his chill­ing sug­ges­tion spread fear around the world. For many it seemed as though the bib­li­cal sto­ry of Armaged­don was about to be real­ized; the sev­enth angel would emp­ty his vial into the atmos­phere, and it would con­tain radioac­tive cobalt-60.

The sto­ry of the cobalt bomb is an unwrit­ten chap­ter of the cold war. In my new book Dooms­day Men: The Real Dr Strangelove and the Dream of the Super­weapon I explore its his­to­ry and cul­tur­al impact for the first time.

For Szi­lard it was a dra­mat­ic way of warn­ing peo­ple about weapons of mass destruc­tion and the esca­lat­ing arms race. Sci­en­tists had been praised by many for cur­tail­ing World War II with the atom­ic bomb. But in the cold war the cre­ators of these apoc­a­lyp­tic super­weapons were seen as hold­ing the fate of the world in their hands. They had trans­formed the laws of nature into instru­ments of mass destruc­tion and, as far as the pub­lic was con­cerned, there would soon be lit­tle to dis­tin­guish real sci­en­tists from that fic­tion­al mas­ter of megadeath, Dr Strangelove.

Leo Szi­lard said that it was the ‘tragedy of mankind’ that the sto­ry of the atom­ic bomb began with laud­able hopes for a bet­ter future. At the begin­ning of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, peo­ple had mar­velled at the hid­den worlds revealed by X‑rays and were awestruck by the mys­te­ri­ous glow of the new mir­a­cle ele­ment, radi­um. As Dooms­day Men shows, such dis­cov­er­ies offered tan­gi­ble hopes that a new age was dawn­ing.

The Hungarian Quartet

It is said that Leo Szi­lard was the most bril­liant sci­en­tist nev­er to have won a Nobel Prize. His vision of an atom­ic utopia was inspired in part by the fic­tion of H. G. Wells. I first came across this remark­able Hun­gar­i­an-born sci­en­tist while research­ing Einstein’s life. The two men were great friends and col­lab­o­rat­ed on one of the great for­got­ten research projects of the last cen­tu­ry – a house­hold refrig­er­a­tor (it should be said that it was rather a rev­o­lu­tion­ary one). I soon realised that Szilard’s life epit­o­mised the glo­ries and the fol­lies of sci­ence in the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry: the sto­ry of the Dooms­day Men could not be writ­ten with­out him.

The sci­en­tists who would lead the world into the atom­ic era emerged from Berlin’s gold­en age of physics in the 1920s. Among them was Szi­lard him­self, known to his friends as the ‘inventor of all things’. The sto­ry of Szilard’s mis­sion to save the world takes us through the first, explo­sive years of the atom­ic age and into the cold war. It is a sto­ry that fea­tures three of his fel­low coun­try­men: Eugene Wign­er, John von Neu­mann and Edward Teller. Togeth­er they were the Hun­gar­i­an Quar­tet, a group of remark­able sci­en­tists who all played lead­ing roles in the Man­hat­tan Project to build the atom­ic bomb and lat­er became key fig­ures in cold-war Amer­i­ca. All were inspired by the dream of the super­weapon.

US cover

In the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, sci­en­tists were raised up to be gods only to be cast down as dev­ils. Films and fic­tion first turned them into sav­iours who free the world from war. But as fears grew about super­weapons, those sav­iour sci­en­tists were trans­formed into mad sci­en­tists. How­ev­er, the his­to­ry of weapons of mass destruc­tion in the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry is not just about sol­diers and sci­en­tists.

To explain why some of the most gift­ed and ide­al­is­tic men of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry spent so much effort try­ing to destroy the plan­et, I need­ed to pur­sue the ori­gins of these hopes and fears, not only in the lives of the sci­en­tists but also in films, fic­tion and oth­er pop­u­lar media. For humankind’s most ter­ri­ble yet inge­nious inven­tions were inspired by a des­per­ate dream, one that was shared by a whole cul­ture. It is a dream that may yet turn into a night­mare for us all.

Leo Szi­lard also played a lit­tle-known but cru­cial role in inspir­ing the Dooms­day Machine that ends the world in Stan­ley Kubrick­’s cold war clas­sic Dr Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Wor­ry­ing and Love the Bomb. This fea­tures in the book but I have also dis­cussed it in a blog here.

As I explain in my book, ‘Perimetr’ is the code-name of the com­put­erised sys­tem designed to pro­tect the Sovi­et Union against a sneak nuclear attack from the US. Also known as the Dead Hand, it bears an uncan­ny resem­blance to the ‘Dooms­day Machine’ described in the film Dr Strangelove. It went oper­a­tional in 1985. As far as any­one knows, it remains com­bat alert today. On new infor­ma­tion that came to light in 2009 about the Dead Hand, see my piece here.

Dooms­day Men and “The Return of the Dooms­day Machine” in today’s Rus­sia is the sub­ject of an inter­est­ing arti­cle by Ron Rosen­baum at Slate Mag­a­zine. There have also been pieces on this by Bran­don Keim at Wired, by Kevin Arthur at Ques­tion Tech­nol­o­gy, and Simon Rohling at the Ger­man site Tele­po­lis (among many oth­ers).

Bill Ham­mack of WILL Radio’s ‘The After­noon Mag­a­zine’ has inter­viewed me about Dooms­day Men. To hear this 45-minute pro­gramme click here (MP3) or vis­it their archive page here.

You can also lis­ten to an inter­view I did on Dooms­day Men and the Cold War for the BBC’s The World Today below.
[audio:World_Today_Doomsday_Men.mp3]

My paper “Faust, the Physi­cists and the Atom­ic Bomb” (based on a lec­ture I gave in 2006 and pub­lished in 2008) explores themes dis­cussed in my book Dooms­day Men, in par­tic­u­lar the cross-fer­til­iza­tion between sci­ence and lit­er­a­ture in the 1930s, at key moments in atom­ic physics and in the devel­op­ment of the atom­ic bomb. Read more here and here.

I have also writ­ten a chap­ter enti­tled “Gen­tle­men: You are mad!’: Mutu­al Assured Destruc­tion and Cold War Cul­ture” for the Oxford Hand­book of Post­war Euro­pean His­to­ry (OUP, 2012), edit­ed by Pro­fes­sor Dan Stone.

Clare Dud­man inter­viewed me in 2009 for her lit­er­ary blog, Keep­er of the Snails.

In Decem­ber 2014, San­ford Simons — the “Plu­to­ni­um Col­lec­tor” whose sto­ry I told in Chap­ter 3 of Dooms­day Men - died. I wrote a piece about why he took the sam­ple of plu­to­ni­um in 1946 and what hap­pened to him after­wards. You can read it here.

Reviews of Doomsday Men

“Books on nuclear physics aren’t often enter­tain­ing to the layper­son, but Dooms­day Men is com­pre­hen­si­ble and fas­ci­nat­ing, although like­ly to send one scur­ry­ing to lead-line the cup­board under the stairs just in case.”
— Helen Zaltz­man, The Observ­er, Octo­ber 5 2008

“Writ­ten with all the pace of a thriller, this is a com­pelling, and ulti­mate­ly extreme­ly chill­ing, look at the way sci­en­tif­ic dis­cov­ery has always gone hand-in-hand with war­fare”.
Dai­ly Mail, Octo­ber 2008

“It is a tremen­dous­ly rich and reward­ing book, a mag­nif­i­cent accom­plish­ment — and, I think, an impor­tant one.”
— Clare Dud­man, Keep­er of the Snails, 2009

“It is an impas­sioned account of every­thing from the dis­cov­ery of radioac­tiv­i­ty to plans for a Dooms­day Device (yes, there real­ly were such plans) from an author who feels that to the gen­er­a­tions grow­ing up who see the Cold War only as some­thing in his­to­ry books, the true hor­ror of nuclear weapons has been for­got­ten. While politi­cians talk glibly of ‘weapons of mass destruc­tion’, nobody has any real feel­ing for what it means to expe­ri­ence intense machine gun fire, the kind of bomb­ing that destroyed Dres­den, or a nuclear holo­caust. Nor do many peo­ple know that there are still about 30,000 nuclear weapons still ready for launch around the world. Dooms­day Men aims to address that gap, focus­ing on nuclear weapons, but also look­ing at oth­er forms of mass destruc­tion. […]Dooms­day Men is … impor­tant, and, depress­ing­ly, there is a need for it — peo­ple, espe­cial­ly younger peo­ple than me, ought to read it”.
— John Grib­bin, Lit­er­ary Review, July 2007

“The sto­ry of the plan to cre­ate the C‑bomb — a nu­clear bomb cap­able of dest­roy­ing all life on Earth — is chill­ing. Yet PD Smith’s his­to­ry, told with the joy­ful enthu­si­asm of a sci-fi afi­ciona­do, is also irre­sistible.”
Dai­ly Tele­graph, Octo­ber 2008

“Smith does a fine job of dili­gent research and sum­ma­ry”.
— Ross Leck­ie, The Times, Sep­tem­ber 2008

“Weav­ing togeth­er biog­ra­phy, sci­ence and art, Smith has cre­at­ed a com­pelling his­to­ry of physics in the 20th cen­tu­ry… Smith’s dynam­ic, riv­et­ing nar­ra­tive reveals details of peo­ple, places and events that are rarely cov­ered in text­books, bring­ing to life not just sci­en­tists like Robert Oppen­heimer and Leo Szi­lard, but the hor­rors of chem­i­cal and atom­ic warfare…Captivating and thor­ough­ly ref­er­enced, this chron­i­cle should inter­est a wide audi­ence, from sci­ence and his­to­ry buffs to arm­chair politi­cos.”
Pub­lish­ers Week­ly, starred review, Jan­u­ary 7, 2008

Dooms­day Men is prodi­gious­ly researched, the author seem­ing to have read every­thing on nuclear strat­e­gy, both fic­tion and non-fic­tion”.
— Gregg Herken, Nature, August 23, 2007

“The sci­ence is told with a Bill Bryson­ish kind of panache. But, at times, it becomes a cross between Bryson and Umber­to Eco. There is a sub-nar­ra­tive of eso­teric knowl­edge and mys­te­ri­ous, aston­ish­ing­ly accu­rate pre­dic­tions from HG Wells. Learned, acces­si­ble, and draw­ing occa­sion­al­ly on the styl­is­tic skills of the nov­el­ist, this makes for a very good read.”
— Revd Dr Gavin Ashen­den, The Church Times, Novem­ber 23, 2007

“Humane and high­ly read­able”
— Christo­pher Hirst, The Inde­pen­dent, Octo­ber 31, 2008

“One of the main strengths of this account lies in Smith’s abil­i­ty to com­bine sci­ence, his­to­ry, and fic­tion in an engross­ing cul­tur­al his­to­ry of one of the con­cepts lying at the heart of the Cold War. … Smith charts out fas­ci­nat­ing­ly how the fig­ure of the sci­en­tist fluc­tu­at­ed in the peri­od from the turn of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry up to the 1960s between the polar­ized extremes of a role as sav­iour of human­i­ty or its vil­lain­ous destroy­er.”
— Prof David Seed, Mod­ern Lan­guage Review 104.1 (Jan­u­ary 2009), 195–6

“chill­ing­ly com­pelling”
New Sci­en­tist, June 2, 2007

“British his­to­ri­an of sci­ence PD Smith mas­ter­ful­ly chron­i­cles the lit­er­ary antecedents and cul­tur­al reper­cus­sions of the devel­op­ment of nuclear arma­ments… Dooms­day Men offers a mar­velous resource for under­stand­ing the issues and per­son­al­i­ties under­ly­ing Kubrick­’s mas­ter­piece and oth­er cre­ative inter­pre­ta­tions of the Cold War. From pulp sci­ence-fic­tion sto­ries to Godzil­la’s the­atri­cal inva­sions, it is a ver­i­ta­ble lex­i­con of atom­ic-age cul­ture… With the Cold War fad­ing into his­to­ry, Dooms­day Men offers a valu­able reminder of the peri­od’s fears and foibles. It pro­vides an out­stand­ing guide to a piv­otal era when human­i­ty first faced the ter­ri­fy­ing prospect of anni­hi­la­tion by its own hand.”
Philadel­phia Inquir­er, Jan­u­ary 28, 2008

“…superb… The research is impres­sive, but it’s his eye for reveal­ing anec­dotes and his abil­i­ty to dis­til it all into live­ly prose that makes this a real plea­sure to read.”
Sun­day Busi­ness Post, June 17, 2007

Dooms­day Men doesn’t just deal with ther­monu­clear destruc­tion. It’s a metic­u­lous account of weapons of mass destruc­tion and the sci­ence and sci­en­tists behind them. Indeed, it is two books for the price of one, because it is also a cul­tur­al dis­qui­si­tion. Smith scours fic­tion for visions of death rays and lurid imag­in­ings of Armaged­don to show how writ­ers often pre­ced­ed or influ­enced sci­en­tists. … always read­able and enter­tain­ing … PD Smith deserves some sort of award for val­ue for mon­ey”.
— Tibor Fis­ch­er, Dai­ly Tele­graph, June 30, 2007

“… mas­sive, but live­ly… Smith’s impres­sive research turns up innum­ber­able end of the world thrillers… A com­pe­tent his­to­ry of WMDs com­bined with a cap­a­ti­vat­ing account of books and films that pre­dict­ed their dis­cov­ery…” — Kirkus Reviews, Sep­tem­ber 2007

“engag­ing, unset­tling… Sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly and cul­tur­al­ly adept, Dooms­day Men tracks the pur­suit of dev­as­tat­ing weapon­ry in both lab­o­ra­to­ries and pulp mag­a­zines. Smith’s wide-rang­ing book also serves as a biog­ra­phy of sorts of the sci­en­tist, writer and thinker Leo Szi­lard, who emblema­tizes sci­ence’s grow­ing aware­ness of the con­se­quences of its own thirst for knowledge.…Smith’s star­tling sto­ry chron­i­cles the ways in which sci­ence divorced itself from human­i­ty”. — The Moscow Times, Feb­ru­ary 15, 2008

“he puts the nuclear age into a new con­text, engag­ing­ly and even excit­ing­ly”
Finan­cial Times, July 21, 2007

“… Dooms­day Men is well worth read­ing. It is a pow­er­ful reminder that weapons of mass destruc­tion are still ‘out there’ and new ones are being devel­oped every day. But it is not sole­ly about sci­en­tif­ic knowl­edge; it ranges much wider than sci­ence fic­tion. It tells the sto­ry of dis­as­ter. One ques­tion is left hang­ing: will we allow our gov­ern­ments to repeat the mis­takes of the last cen­tu­ry?”
— Joan­na Bourke, Inde­pen­dent, August 10, 2007

“Smith enter­tain­ing­ly takes on Dr Doom and his col­leagues, set­ting them in pop­u­lar cul­ture as sci­en­tif­ic mes­si­ahs and mad­men.”
Times, June 23, 2007

Dooms­day Men is a grip­ping but dis­turb­ing read… What it high­lights for me is the unavoid­able social respon­si­bil­i­ty that sci­en­tists car­ry for their work and the con­stant dan­ger that sci­en­tists may be reduced to being lit­tle more than ‘tools of war’.”
Physics Edu­ca­tion, March 2008, vol 43, pp 217–19

“a chill­ing­ly com­pelling his­to­ry of chem­i­cal, bio­log­i­cal and atom­ic super­weapons … Dooms­day Men analy­ses dozens of exam­ples of how cul­ture influ­enced sci­ence in the devis­ing of super­weapons. They range from the prophet­ic writ­ings of HG Wells, and the sci­ence fic­tion pub­lished in Amaz­ing Sto­ries and oth­er mag­a­zines in the 1920s and 1930s, to high­ly influ­en­tial post-atom­ic-bomb nov­els such as Nevil Shute’s On the Beach and Morde­cai Roshwald’s Lev­el 7. And, of course, there is the dark­ly com­ic film Dr Strangelove, direct­ed by Stan­ley Kubrick in 1963, in which the sto­ry cen­tres around the ‘doomsday machine’ — a phrase orig­i­nal­ly coined by gung-ho phy­isic­st Her­man Kahn. … [Dooms­day Men] suc­cess­ful­ly shows how and why super­weapons have been simul­ta­ne­ous­ly admired and reviled by both sci­en­tists and the pub­lic.”
— Andrew Robin­son, Physics World, July 2007, p 48

“aca­d­e­m­ic, enter­tain­ing, inform­ing, thought-provoking…8/10”
In The News, June 13, 2007

“Told large­ly from the view­point of the sci­en­tists devot­ed to turn­ing the mil­i­tary’s demands into real­i­ty, PD Smith’s account is packed with strik­ing anec­dotes… this is a read­able, infor­ma­tive work explor­ing why intel­li­gent men worked on such insane projects”.
Metro, June 13, 2007

“This is the sto­ry of the men behind attempts to devel­op a super­weapon — a weapon so utter­ly dev­as­tat­ing that no force on Earth could over­come it… Dooms­day Men is easy to read and gives a good insight into the per­son­al­i­ties of some of the sci­en­tists involved in WMD.”
— Frank Barn­a­by, BBC FOCUS Mag­a­zine, August 2007

“Smith’s study is the grip­ping, untold sto­ry of the ulti­mate weapon of mass destruc­tion, which first came to pub­lic atten­tion in 1950 when the Hun­gar­i­an-born sci­en­tist Leo Szi­lard made a dra­mat­ic announce­ment on radio: sci­ence was on the verge of cre­at­ing a Dooms­day Bomb. For the first time in his­to­ry, mankind would soon have the abil­i­ty to destroy all life on the plan­et. The shock­wave from this state­ment rever­ber­at­ed across the fol­low­ing decade and beyond.”
— Christo­pher Cok­er, Times Lit­er­ary Sup­ple­ment, 8 August 2007

“an illu­mi­nat­ing, excit­ing and mem­o­rable read”
Flip­side

“Less than a decade after the first atom­ic bomb was dropped on Hiroshi­ma, total anni­hi­la­tion of the human race haunt­ed the imag­i­na­tion of sci­en­tists and writ­ers alike, a con­ver­gence that PD Smith chron­i­cles dogged­ly in Dooms­day Men”.
— William Grimes, New York Times, Decem­ber 28, 2007

“a com­pre­hen­sive review of Cold War cul­tur­al his­to­ry”
Depart­ment of the Plan­et Earth, Feb­ru­ary 2008

“[P.D. Smith] charts the ways in which sci­ence and sci­ence fic­tion inter­act­ed in a quest for Dooms­day ‘superweapons’ in the 20th cen­tu­ry. From HG Wells to Dr Strangelove and after, fic­tion has evoked weapons of mass destruc­tion and their con­se­quences, and cre­at­ed new hori­zons of pos­si­bil­i­ty. Many sci­en­tists and pol­i­cy-mak­ers react­ed to the pos­si­bil­i­ties, and from the First World War onwards, sci­en­tists worked with the mil­i­tary to pro­duce the weapons and strate­gies that shaped the world in which we now live.”
BBC His­to­ry Mag­a­zine, Sep­tem­ber 2007

“Smith deliv­ers an indeli­ble reminder that we ignore our worst night­mares at our own per­il”.
Asso­ci­at­ed Press, Decem­ber 2007

“…for those with the time and incli­na­tion to get their heads around nuclear physics, with its dizzy­ing inter­min­gling of the mas­sive and the infin­i­tes­i­mal, then P. D. Smith’s Dooms­day Men is as good a place to start as any. Despite its rather tit­il­lat­ing title and the schlock-hor­ror gaudi­ness of its fifties-style cov­er, Smith’s is a huge­ly inter­est­ing his­to­ry of some huge­ly dif­fi­cult sub­ject mat­ter, in which the alche­my of nuclear fis­sion and fusion is mere­ly part of a wider sto­ry stretch­ing back to the nine­teenth cen­tu­ry… Smith is no less fas­ci­nat­ing on the pre-his­to­ry of weapons of mass destruc­tion, from the chem­i­cal weapons of the First World War, to Japan’s exper­i­ments with bio­log­i­cal weapon­ry, to the bomb­ing of Ger­man and Japan­ese cities (the accounts of which are scarce­ly less har­row­ing than the accounts of the effects of the atom bomb).”
— Richard King, The Aus­tralian Lit­er­ary Review, Novem­ber 2007

“…well-writ­ten and infi­nite­ly inter­est­ing. It is also incred­i­bly fright­en­ing”.
Green­beard, May 2008

“Smith…puts sci­ence’s Faus­t­ian bar­gain through its lit­er­ary paces”.
Book­list, Decem­ber 15, 2007

“[a] valu­able account”
Sur­vival: Glob­al Pol­i­tics and Strat­e­gy, Vol­ume 50, Issue 5, 2008, pp 209–10

“cap­ti­vat­ing…”
Buf­fa­lo News (New York), Jan­u­ary 13, 2008

Buy at Pen­guin (ePub eBook) | Ama­zon UK | Ama­zon US | Barnes & Noble (Nook edn) | Indiebound