PD Smith

Kafka’s mouse

23 June 2007 | Bentham, Dawkins, Einstein, Kafka, Kafka's mouse, Science & literature, UCL, Writing & Poetry | 7 comments

Just in case any of you are won­der­ing why I called this site ‘Kafka’s mouse’ (and I know some of you are), you might like to read this piece I’ve just writ­ten for the Inde­pen­dent. They asked me to write about my ‘Book of a Life­time’ and I decid­ed to bend the rules slight­ly and to do one on a short sto­ry. Here it is:

I first read Kafka’s sto­ry “Josephine the Singer, or the Mouse- folk” when I was study­ing Ger­man lit­er­a­ture. It has haunt­ed me ever since. It was writ­ten in March 1924, three months before Kaf­ka died. He had tuber­cu­lo­sis of the lar­ynx, and was unable to speak — a poignant back­ground for a sto­ry about a singer. But it was Kafka’s writ­ing, not his trag­ic life, that made such an impres­sion on me.

Although the title tells us this is a sto­ry about mice, the word is nev­er used. You become uncom­fort­ably aware that he is writ­ing about us. Part of Kafka’s genius is to trick the read­er into see­ing our own world dif­fer­ent­ly. When Josephine sings, her audi­ence is trans­fixed with­out know­ing why. The nar­ra­tor can­not pin down what it is about her singing that means so much to them. They lis­ten in utter silence and some­times it is dif­fi­cult to tell whether it is the singing or the still­ness that sur­rounds her voice that is so com­pelling. Para­dox­i­cal­ly, those lis­ten­ing feel her voice is noth­ing spe­cial; but there is an elu­sive qual­i­ty that moves them: “Some­thing of our poor brief child­hood is in it, some­thing of lost hap­pi­ness that can nev­er be found again, but also some­thing of active dai­ly life, of its small gai­eties”.

Tucked away at the back of the col­lec­tion Wed­ding Prepa­ra­tions in the Coun­try and Oth­er Sto­ries, trans­lat­ed beau­ti­ful­ly by Willa and Edwin Muir, the sto­ry is a remark­able med­i­ta­tion on the pow­er of art and its place in soci­ety. Kaf­ka is the nar­ra­tor and the artist, crit­i­cis­ing Josephine (who has dis­ap­peared, pre­sum­ably in a fit of pri­madon­na pique) while also cel­e­brat­ing art’s abil­i­ty to see beyond the mun­dane world. The dis­turb­ing strange­ness of his oth­er works is absent — at least on the sur­face. But the won­der­ful ambi­gu­i­ties that Kaf­ka delights in (or was tor­ment­ed by) are here, as is his unique sen­si­tiv­i­ty: he saw shades of psy­cho­log­i­cal sub­tle­ty in sit­u­a­tions that most would scarce­ly notice.

As a lec­tur­er at Uni­ver­si­ty Col­lege Lon­don, I start­ed writ­ing a Kafkaesque nov­el about aca­d­e­m­ic life. To whom else could you turn in a uni­ver­si­ty where the institution’s founder, Jere­my Ben­tham, is kept mum­mi­fied in a glass case in the entrance hall? Lat­er, while research­ing the lives of sci­en­tists, I was struck by the par­al­lels between Josephine’s hon­oured role in her soci­ety and the way we idolise sci­en­tists such as Ein­stein, whom Kaf­ka met in Prague. After all, the great­est sci­ence — as Richard Dawkins has said — allows us to “hear the galax­ies sing”. Whether Josephine rep­re­sents sci­ence or art, to me her singing sym­bol­is­es what life is about: the quest to under­stand our­selves and our place in the uni­verse. Such songs are dif­fi­cult if not impos­si­ble to describe in words. But like love, they infuse life with mean­ing.

7 comments so far:

  1. Kaytie M. Lee | 23 June 2007

    I love hear­ing about sto­ries that haunt writ­ers. I’ve got this sto­ry in a col­lec­tion, one of those book­store edi­tions, and I plan to reread it this after­noon. At the time I was singing in com­ic opera pro­duc­tions so as I recall it was one of the sto­ries that meant some­thing to me…but that was sev­en or eight years ago.

  2. PD Smith | 23 June 2007

    it’s cer­tain­ly a sto­ry that is worth re-read­ing. The best ones always are…enjoy!

    Hope your new nov­el is going well…

  3. Paul Halpern | 24 June 2007

    I very much enjoyed read­ing your piece. I am struck by the line “Some­thing of our poor brief child­hood is in it, some­thing of lost hap­pi­ness that can nev­er be found again, but also some­thing of active dai­ly life, of its small gai­eties” and won­der whether Josephine, as singer (or sci­en­tist, as you sug­gest) rep­re­sents the regrets adults have as their inter­ests nec­es­sar­i­ly shink and nar­row when they take on the myr­i­ad respon­si­bil­i­ties of grown life. In that man­ner, chil­dren, with their vir­tu­al­ly unlim­it­ed hopes and dream, tow­er above those whose ambi­tions has nar­rowed over time, turn­ing them into indus­tri­ous, but less ide­al­is­tic “mice.” When Josephine sings, then, mem­o­ries of the lost hopes of child­hood return. In that sense, I’m remind­ed of Man­n’s “Death in Venice.” Thanks for rec­om­mend­ing that Kaf­ka sto­ry.

  4. Shannon | 24 June 2007

    The way you describe this sto­ry, it seems like there could be so many mean­ings infused in it that even Kaf­ka was­n’t aware of. Or maybe he was. Some­times I think an artist’s sub­con­scious is sneak­ing in it’s own points while the artist isn’t look­ing. Your piece makes me won­der if he was­n’t also say­ing that even if some­one does­n’t under­stand ful­ly what they are lis­ten­ing to (read­ing, etc) they can still be moved on an emo­tion­al lev­el. Also, “the singing or the still­ness” invokes the notion of oppo­sites. You can’t appre­ci­ate light with­out dark­ness, that sort of thing.
    In any case, thanks for shar­ing. It is always inter­est­ing to under­stand how we humans inspire each oth­er.

  5. PD Smith | 25 June 2007

    Hi Paul — yes, that’s a poignant thought, and I think it is cer­tain­ly there in the nar­ra­tor’s words. Her songs remind them of an age of innocence…but I think her songs mean dif­fer­ent things for dif­fer­ent lis­ten­ers; that’s part of their beau­ty, at least for me… “Death in Venice” — there’s anoth­er haunt­ing sto­ry… Thanks for remind­ing me of it!

    Hi Shan­non — yes, that’s a won­der­ful idea and I’m sure it’s true: that there are more mean­ings in a sto­ry than even the author was aware of. And I agree too about the para­dox­i­cal (dialec­ti­cal?) nature of Kafka’s writ­ing. That’s one of the things that makes his work so elo­quent, so evocative…It’s like a tune you can’t get out of your head; just keeps on play­ing…

    Good to hear from you both! — P.

  6. Paul Halpern | 25 June 2007

    As a fur­ther note, your “Kafkaesque nov­el about aca­d­e­m­ic life” sounds intrigu­ing. The only nov­el about acad­e­mia I’ve read is Mal­colm Brad­bury’s The His­to­ry Man” which is very cut­ting and fun­ny.

  7. PD Smith | 26 June 2007

    Not pub­lished, unfor­tu­nate­ly… “Lucky Jim” is anoth­er favourite on the ivory tow­ers. Well worth a read…