PD Smith

Brecht, writing and cigars

08 September 2006 | atomic bomb, Bacon, Bohr, Brecht, cold war, Doomsday Men, Einstein, H-bomb, Hare, Penguin, Turney, Writing & Poetry | Post a comment

I’ve always loved that pho­to­graph of Bertolt Brecht from the 1930s in which he’s wear­ing a work­er’s flat cap and smok­ing a thick Cuban cig­ar. It seems to cap­ture some­thing of his para­dox­i­cal per­son­al­i­ty — Brecht, the bour­geois Bol­she­vik.

There’s a fine pro­duc­tion by David Hare cur­rent­ly run­ning at the Nation­al of what is for my mon­ey Brecht’s great­est play. Brecht worked on The Life of Galileo longer than any oth­er play. There are three ver­sions: one com­plet­ed in 1938, anoth­er fin­ished in Amer­i­ca just before the atom­ic bomb­ing of Japan, and a final ver­sion from 1955.

Writ­ten in exile on the same Dan­ish island where Niels Bohr worked on his doc­tor­al the­sis, Brecht’s orig­i­nal play high­lights the plight of intel­lec­tu­als — such as those left behind in Nazi Ger­many — who resist author­i­tar­i­an regimes in the name of intel­lec­tu­al free­dom. But the atom­ic bomb changed every­thing for Brecht. “Overnight the biog­ra­phy of the founder of the new physics read dif­fer­ent­ly,” he wrote.

What had been a play about sci­ence as a dis­ci­pline with the poten­tial to lib­er­ate peo­ple from an irra­tional world-view, was recast into one which illus­trates the refusal of sci­en­tists to accept their respon­si­bil­i­ty to humankind and their com­plic­i­ty in the mis­use of sci­ence. For Brecht, Galileo’s recan­ta­tion before the author­i­ty of the Church came to rep­re­sent the Fall of sci­ence. Galileo is no longer a hero but a trai­tor.

Ein­stein died on 18 April 1955, two days after the Cologne première of Galileo. In his notes, Brecht iden­ti­fies Ein­stein’s equa­tion E=mc2 as an exam­ple of how the ide­al of pure sci­ence has become very dan­ger­ous in the mod­ern era. Such equa­tions can so eas­i­ly be turned into the math­e­mat­ics of mass mur­der.

Audi­ences in the cold war would have instant­ly seen that Brecht’s Galileo was not just a his­to­ry play, but about pol­i­tics and the pur­pose of sci­ence. Brecht tipped his work­er’s cap to Fran­cis Bacon when he wrote that sci­ence should be about reliev­ing the drudgery of human exis­tence. What is the point of the dis­cov­er­ies of Galileo and his fel­low physi­cists (he asks) if all they ulti­mate­ly lead to is big­ger and bet­ter bombs? One day, pre­dicts an old­er and wis­er Galileo, the sci­en­tists’ yells of Eure­ka! will be greet­ed by a uni­ver­sal cry of hor­ror because of the ever more ter­ri­ble super­weapons their dis­cov­er­ies make pos­si­ble.

David Hare’s pro­duc­tion is excel­lent (apart from the pseu­do-Cabaret car­ni­val scene, about which the less said the bet­ter). Simon Rus­sell Beale’s per­for­mance in the title role is superb and cap­tures per­fect­ly the pas­sion for life and sci­ence that is cen­tral to Brecht’s Galileo. But the con­tem­po­rary rel­e­vance of Brecht’s sci­en­tif­ic mes­sage at a time of renewed fears about weapons of mass destruc­tion seems absent from Hare’s ver­sion, which is a missed oppor­tu­ni­ty. Although to my eyes, the stage set evoked the skele­tal remains of the Hiroshi­ma Atom­ic Bomb Dome, a haunt­ing reminder of the dead­ly pow­er of the laws of physics. Or was it just meant to rep­re­sent an obser­va­to­ry?

I spent the evening at the Nation­al with my edi­tor, Jon Tur­ney,and his fam­i­ly. The edit­ing on Dooms­day Men is com­plete, well almost. Less is more, was Jon’s ratio­nale and I kept repeat­ing it to myself like a mantra as I decid­ed whether to accept or decline his dele­tions. Being edit­ed is a bit like going to the den­tist. It’s painful but you know it’s for the best. And thanks to Jon, the final text is much improved. When you live and breathe a book project for years, it’s dif­fi­cult to find the dis­tance nec­es­sary to see where a few more words are need­ed or some can be cut. That’s why a good edi­tor is so impor­tant. It’s a les­son some pub­lish­ers have for­got­ten. For­tu­nate­ly Pen­guin is not one of them.

So now, after three years of research­ing the life and times of the Dooms­day Men, I’ve returned my last library book (at one point I had fifty on loan) and checked the final end­note ref­er­ence (there are over a thou­sand). It’s at moments like these that you feel like putting your feet up and light­ing a Brecht­ian cig­ar…

[orig­i­nal­ly on MySpace]

Comments are closed.