PD Smith

Rush-Hour review

30 September 2015 | Reviewing, Watching the Detectives

Apolo­gies for the lack of posts over the last few months, but life has been pret­ty hec­tic for me. We moved house and then my moth­er died, which was all rather trau­mat­ic, as I guess you can imag­ine.
Any­way, I’ve man­aged to get at least a few book shelves up in my new office (you have to get your pri­or­i­ties right, don’t you). Here’s the view from my win­dow, although I do now use a slight­ly more up-to-date word proces­sor than this one…

window

I’m work­ing hard on Watch­ing the Detec­tives. For a num­ber of rea­sons too bor­ing to explain, this book has tak­en longer than I hoped to research and write. But my pub­lish­er, Blooms­bury, is being very under­stand­ing and I’m back on the case, track­ing down the sleuths. Watch this space, as they say…

In addi­tion to my brief non-fic­tion reviews which I write for the Guardian, I did one for the TLS recent­ly on Iain Gate­ly’s Rush Hour, a fas­ci­nat­ing his­to­ry of com­mut­ing. Unfor­tu­nate­ly they don’t put their reviews online, so here’s my ver­sion (which may dif­fer slight­ly from the pub­lished one). Enjoy!

Filthy London

02 January 2015 | cities, London, Reviewing

I’ve just been wal­low­ing in the his­to­ry of filthy Lon­don, cour­tesy of Lee Jack­son’s excel­lent new book, Dirty Old Lon­don: The Vic­to­ri­an Fight Against Filth. It’s a won­der­ful trawl through the his­to­ry of Lon­don’s sew­ers, ceme­ter­ies, and street clean­ers. Did you know that by the 1890s, Lon­don need­ed some 300,000 hors­es to keep it mov­ing and that 1,000 tons of dung were deposit­ed each day on the city’s streets? No won­der its streets were dirty!

Any­way, here’s the first para­graph of my review:

“I have seen the great­est won­der which the world can show to the aston­ished spir­it.” So said the Ger­man poet Hein­rich Heine in 1827, and the won­der he referred to was Lon­don. In the course of the 19th cen­tu­ry, London’s pop­u­la­tion soared from one mil­lion to six mil­lion. This boom­ing cen­tre of com­merce and indus­try was at “the heart of the great­est empire ever known”, but, as Lee Jack­son adds, Lon­don “was also infa­mous­ly filthy”. The Chi­nese ambas­sador turned his nose up at this most dynam­ic city, com­plain­ing it was “too dirty”. He had a point, for this was a place whose infra­struc­ture had scarce­ly changed in cen­turies. Cesspools were over­flow­ing, the ceme­ter­ies were burst­ing with stink­ing corpses, the streets were coat­ed with nox­ious black mud, rot­ting rub­bish clogged its alleys, and its cit­i­zens lived in over­crowd­ed, decrepit build­ings, breath­ing air that was heav­i­ly pol­lut­ed with soot and sul­phurous fumes. This was the filthy real­i­ty of Lon­don for most of its inhab­i­tants.

You can read the rest of my review over on the Guardian’s web­site. Or you could even buy the paper tomor­row.

By the way: Hap­py New Year!

The Plutonium Collector

29 December 2014 | Atomic Age, atomic bomb, Doomsday Men, Los Alamos, nuclear weapons, plutonium, Sanford Simons | 2 comments

Dur­ing the hol­i­days I noticed that San­ford Lawrence Simons had died of can­cer aged 92 in Lit­tle­ton, Col­orado. In 1950 he became known to the press as the “plu­to­ni­um col­lec­tor” after he was arrest­ed by the FBI for steal­ing a sam­ple of the dead­ly new radioac­tive ele­ment from Los Alam­os. Simons had been part of the Man­hat­tan Project dur­ing the war. But in 1946, he had removed a glass vial from the weapons lab­o­ra­to­ry. It con­tained a small amount of the ele­ment that had been at the heart of the Nagasa­ki atom­ic bomb.

In 1950, a few months after Leo Szi­lard had explained to the Amer­i­can peo­ple on nation­al radio how a nuclear dooms­day device could be cre­at­ed, FBI offi­cers raid­ed Simons’ home on the out­skirts of Den­ver and, after a brief search, dis­cov­ered the stolen plu­to­ni­um hid­den beneath the house. In the draw­er of a dress­er, the FBI men also found sev­er­al pieces of ura­ni­um.

That day the 28-year-old research sci­en­tist was led away in hand­cuffs. After­wards his daugh­ter remem­bers him jok­ing about the arrest. But at the time it was no laugh­ing mat­ter. I described what hap­pened and the media reac­tion to it in my book Dooms­day Men.

DM US cover

Simons, who had trained as a met­al­lur­gi­cal engi­neer, read­i­ly admit­ted tak­ing the radioac­tive mate­r­i­al, but he claimed it was just a “sou­venir” of his time at Los Alam­os, which he left in July 1946. Flanked by two impas­sive FBI men wear­ing Humphrey Bog­a­rt fedo­ras, Simons talked freely with jour­nal­ists after he’d been com­mit­ted for tri­al. Unshaven and hand­cuffed, though still clutch­ing his pipe, Simons seemed remark­ably unfazed by his predica­ment. Under the Atom­ic Ener­gy Act he faced a pos­si­ble max­i­mum sen­tence of five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. Just a few weeks ear­li­er, the FBI had arrest­ed Ethel and Julius Rosen­berg in New York on sus­pi­cion of atom­ic espi­onage. They were both con­vict­ed the fol­low­ing year and, despite inter­na­tion­al pleas for clemen­cy includ­ing from Ein­stein, the cou­ple were sub­se­quent­ly exe­cut­ed in the elec­tric chair.

“Why did I take it?”, said Simons sheep­ish­ly, in answer to reporters’ ques­tions. “Well, it seems pret­ty sil­ly now, but I’ve always col­lect­ed min­er­al sam­ples. I real­ized almost instant­ly that I didn’t want it, but it was like hav­ing a bull by the tail. I couldn’t let go!”

One of the press men asked how he man­aged to smug­gle the plu­to­ni­um out of the top-secret mil­i­tary research lab­o­ra­to­ry.

Simons grinned: “I just walked out with it.”

He explained that the plu­to­ni­um sam­ple had been lying around on his desk for some time. No one had asked for it back and even­tu­al­ly he sim­ply couldn’t resist it.

“There was no real check-up on what was tak­en out of the place at that time,” he added with a shrug.

You wouldn’t have guessed it from what Simons said, but in the 1940s fis­sile ele­ments such as plu­to­ni­um were more pre­cious than gold to the atom­ic bomb project. They were the result of a vast expen­di­ture of mon­ey and effort. Whole cities of work­ers laboured to pro­duce these lethal ele­ments in vast indus­tri­al com­plex­es spe­cial­ly built for the Man­hat­tan Project. Each gram was the prod­uct of thou­sands of man hours. It was not unusu­al to see sci­en­tists down on their hands and knees, sweep­ing the floor with Geiger coun­ters, hunt­ing for the small­est stray piece of met­al that might have been dropped.

Atomic Age Opens, 1945

Some­times the Geiger counter would crack­le furi­ous­ly as it passed over a tiny orange or black speck on someone’s lab coat, reveal­ing the tell-tale signs of dan­ger­ous radioac­tiv­i­ty. Even the small­est scrap of fis­sion­able mat­ter was extreme­ly valu­able and as a result lab coats were treat­ed rou­tine­ly with chem­i­cals to reclaim these ele­ments. The jour­nal­ists pressed the FBI agents who arrest­ed Simons as to how much the plu­to­ni­um in the vial was worth. Even­tu­al­ly one said he’d heard fig­ures rang­ing from $500 to $200,000.

San­ford Simons hid the stolen plu­to­ni­um under his house. He had good rea­son to. Plu­to­ni­um has been called the most dan­ger­ous ele­ment on earth. With three small chil­dren, Simons want­ed it out of reach. The glass vial and its dead­ly con­tents remained in its hid­ing place for four years. The FBI only became aware of it after they were tipped off. Simons had let slip in con­ver­sa­tion with a friend that he had some plu­to­ni­um. Per­haps his sense of guilt led Simons to make an unwise com­ment. Or maybe, just once, this mod­est sci­en­tist was tempt­ed into an idle boast. But in the year that Sen­a­tor Joe McCarthy was stok­ing fears about a Com­mu­nist fifth col­umn infil­trat­ing Amer­i­can soci­ety, to admit that you had a key ingre­di­ent for an atom­ic bomb stashed in your home was sim­ply ask­ing for trou­ble.

Wylie, Smuggled Atom Bomb, 1951 edn

Out­side the court­room, a reporter put it to Agent Rus­sell Kramer that tak­ing plu­to­ni­um as a “sou­venir” was a rather corny excuse. The FBI man nod­ded and said, with­out a trace of humour, “He’s a pret­ty corny guy.”

Dur­ing his tri­al, the defence point­ed out that Simons had nev­er been in trou­ble with the police. More impor­tant­ly, he was not a “Red” and had no “Com­mu­nist con­nec­tions.” The defence attor­ney based his case on the pop­u­lar image of the sci­en­tist. He argued, some­what uncon­vinc­ing­ly, that sci­en­tists are “all darned fools” when it came to exper­i­ments. He claimed that sci­en­tif­ic curios­i­ty alone had prompt­ed Simons to take the plu­to­ni­um and ura­ni­um in 1946. It was a case of the irre­sistible allure of for­bid­den knowl­edge, your Hon­our, and, as every­one knew, no sci­en­tist worth his slide-rule could resist that.

But Judge Lee Knous was not par­tic­u­lar­ly impressed by this defence. For tak­ing a pinch of plu­to­ni­um, the dis­graced sci­en­tist was sen­tenced to 18 months in a Fed­er­al prison.

When I was writ­ing Dooms­day Men, the sto­ry of the Plu­to­ni­um Col­lec­tor and the media’s inter­est in it struck me as a won­der­ful exam­ple of the pub­lic fas­ci­na­tion with both sci­en­tists and the new atom­ic forces which they had unleashed. For some rea­son, since writ­ing the book I’ve often thought about Simons and his dan­ger­ous desire for the new ele­ments. At the time I didn’t explore what hap­pened to him after his imprisonment. For­tu­nate­ly, it turns out that his brief spell behind bars didn’t blight his career. Accord­ing to his obit­u­ary, Simons became an inven­tor, run­ning his own bio­med­ical instru­ments com­pa­ny in Col­orado. In that same piece, jour­nal­ist Ann Imse says he was “known for his intel­li­gence, imp­ish per­son­al­i­ty, pet fer­ret and, in his lat­er years, ter­ri­fy­ing­ly wild dri­ving on moun­tain roads.”

But I bet he nev­er for­got the time when he first picked up that valu­able though dead­ly sam­ple of plu­to­ni­um and realised that he could sim­ply pock­et it and walk out of the top-secret Los Alam­os lab­o­ra­to­ry. It’s not sur­pris­ing that Simons wasn’t the only Los Alam­os sci­en­tist who longed to own a sou­venir of the Man­hat­tan Project. Otto Frisch, whose cal­cu­la­tions of crit­i­cal mass were cru­cial in the ear­ly stages of the atom­ic bomb project, shared Simons’ dan­ger­ous fas­ci­na­tion with the new atom­ic ele­ments. When the sil­very blocks of high­ly fis­sion­able ura­ni­um-235 were first deliv­ered to Los Alam­os in April 1945, Frisch felt an over­whelm­ing “urge to take one”. They were the first sam­ples ever made of ura­ni­um-235 met­al, the ele­ment that would blast the heart out of Hiroshi­ma. Strange­ly, Frisch thought the heavy met­al would make a nice paper­weight.

I’m glad things went well for Simons, after his brush with the FBI in 1950. In my book I explored how the world became obsessed with the dreams and night­mares of the atom­ic age, ter­ri­fied by mad sci­en­tists and filled with hope by saint­ly ones, such as Ein­stein. Despite his one brief moment of atom­ic mad­ness, San­ford Simons seems to have been a reas­sur­ing­ly ground­ed sort of guy. An every­day kind of sci­en­tist. And in the end I guess that’s the best kind there is.

Science Fiction Quarterly, #1 vol 2 Nov 1952, Moskowitz, atom graphic unsharp

 

If you’ve enjoyed read­ing this post, which is based on my book Dooms­day Men, then you might like to con­sid­er read­ing the whole book.

You can buy absurd­ly cheap copies of it now on Ama­zon, or if you real­ly want to sup­port me and my writ­ing you might like to con­sid­er buy­ing the e‑book. You can buy it direct from Pen­guin (ePub) or from Ama­zon in the UK (Kin­dle), or Barnes & Noble (Nook) in the US. Thanks for read­ing!

Notebook on Cities and Culture

15 April 2014 | cities, City, Detectives, Watching the Detectives

On a very wet day at the end of Jan­u­ary, Col­in Mar­shall inter­viewed me in a Win­ches­ter bar for his excel­lent series of pod­casts, Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture. We talked for about an hour about our expe­ri­ences of cities from Tokyo to Munich, about the dif­fer­ences between cities, about how they are built and how we expe­ri­ence them, about the city of non-places and the city of crime, and many oth­er sub­jects.

You can down­load the pod­cast now on Col­in’s web­site.

Reasons for writing

08 April 2014 | City

As an author, there is noth­ing bet­ter than find­ing an email like this in your inbox:

“I bought your book City a cou­ple of years ago and real­ly enjoyed it. I am a high school teacher, spe­cial­is­ing in geog­ra­phy and urban geog­ra­phy. I have been inspired by your book to re-cre­ate our rather tired urban geog­ra­phy unit, with a move away from a functional/chronological to a more nar­ra­tive teach­ing approach. I am loose­ly bas­ing the struc­ture of the first 7–8 lessons on the chap­ters of your book with a view to both cre­at­ing a deep­er under­stand­ing of the urban envi­ron­ment as well as engag­ing and inspir­ing the stu­dents with sto­ries about some amaz­ing places — much the same as you do in your book.

Real­ly, I guess I am writ­ing this to thank you for inspir­ing me to try hard­er to inspire my kids.”

Neville Gibbs
Wait­akere Col­lege, Auck­land, New Zealand

Com­ments like that make all the hard work of writ­ing and research worth­while. Thanks Neville!